Quote Originally Posted by Master_Rob View Post
Well, there is really no reason we need more troops, it means that many more targets. I back all military people that are in harms way, however at the end of this Iran or Syria will have control of Iraq. There is and has been a civil war there. We need to train their troops get out let them take care of them selves.

We cannot be the rescuer of the world, doing so places us in these positions. No one wants to hear this but we are back in another Viet Nam. If the Saudis would take care of their own fears we would have backed them, but they want us to do their work for that oil.
Thank You
MR
Was the invasion really the result of trying to save the world? If the invasion would have been officially led by a muslim nation and with a broader coalition, and not stressing into war before the allies are ready, things might have turned out a lot different. I mean, both Germany and France was ready to invade, but not on Bush's terms. This invasion was more the result of Texan machismo, rather than a genuine will to save the world. USA isn't the world police, they're too busy being the kind of the hill rather than having a focus on creating a stable political world.

Bush is a born again Christian. He talks constantly about god. The Arabs know it. He's completly and totaly the wrong guy to lead an invasion of a muslim country. USA is not the land of the free. It's the land of Christianity. Yes, I know the paper says something different. Denying it is just stupid.

My two cents.