I would also add, for those who want limit the established 2nd amendment rights (like so many of our rights have been limited in the past 70 or so years,) a simple notion; if you disarm the populace, the only groups that would be armed would the government agents and criminals. I can think of no two groups that I would be more vigilant against than the aforementioned groups. If that means owning and training "assault" rifles than so be it. Also, could those who are opposed to the ownership of "assault" rifles define what an "assault" rifle is?

Regards,
Princi