Quote Originally Posted by leo9 View Post
http://www.care2.com/causes/womens-r...-was-inviting/
I've said this before, and I know it's whistling in the dark because people are never going to be that rational, but sex education for vanillas should also include safewords. It wouldn't just protect women: it would also protect men who honestly can't tell when "No" meaning "Push me" switches to "No" meaning "Stop right there."
From the article:
"The victim wore a tube top, no bra, high heels and plenty of makeup on the night she was raped."

" Justice Robert Dewar believed that rapist Kenneth Rhodes was nothing more than a "clumsy Don Juan" and wasn't really all that bad, because the victim looked so "inviting." "

So, my first questions would be:
If women dress sexy, are they asking for it?
If yes, what should they wear?

Further from the article:
"Using this logic, then breaking and entering into a well-cared-for house in an affluent neighbourhood is not that bad, because it's obvious the house has lots of expensive things in it that are just begging to be stolen.

Using this logic, stealing a BMW that someone had previously given you a ride in is no big deal, because you'd already been invited to sit in the passenger seat."

Does this argument hold?

Next: In DK many males from what is called another ethnical background look at Danish women as whores, by their own statements. It starts at school, where girls in class is
routinely called 'whores'. This has to do with clothes, but also cultural differences.

Last question: whose freedom should be weighed the heaviest: that of religious/cultural norms who says something about how women should be dressed, and who are scandalised at the way women dress, or the right of women to dress as they please?