Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 37

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    {Leo9}
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by lucy View Post
    If that was the case they shouldn't have a problem letting inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) into their facilities to have a good look at what they're doing there. Also, it would be much cheaper and faster to build a couple of power plants burning oil or gaz or coal to generate electricity.
    Then again, I sometimes wonder if other countries find the present nuclear state's self-appoited role of stopping others from having it ok?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    236
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by thir View Post
    Then again, I sometimes wonder if other countries find the present nuclear state's self-appoited role of stopping others from having it ok?
    Most do - that's exactly what they agree to including in international law by signing the non-proliferation treaty, that the five existing nuclear powers stay that way and everyone agrees to work to stop any more countries getting them (in exchange for access to uranium for fuel, information, equipment etc). A few countries aren't signatories (notably India, Israel and Pakistan) and North Korea withdrew from it in 2003; Iran, however, signed it and remains bound today. It's not just the existing nuclear powers, it's almost everyone who agreed that nuclear proliferation is a bad thing.

  3. #3
    {Leo9}
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by js207 View Post
    Most do - that's exactly what they agree to including in international law by signing the non-proliferation treaty, that the five existing nuclear powers stay that way and everyone agrees to work to stop any more countries getting them (in exchange for access to uranium for fuel, information, equipment etc). A few countries aren't signatories (notably India, Israel and Pakistan) and North Korea withdrew from it in 2003; Iran, however, signed it and remains bound today.
    Thanks for updating me.


    It's not just the existing nuclear powers, it's almost everyone who agreed that nuclear proliferation is a bad thing.
    The whole thing would be more believable if said 5 powers renounced their own nuclear powers. As it is, it is just 'we are the good guys and should have it, noone else should.'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top